I
will now offer a forewarning: I am going to talk about New York City again. I
sincerely don’t mean keep talking about nyc, but since I’ve lived under a rock
from most my life in the city, it’s fascinating to learn about all the
sustainability factors the city currently does, or striving to do.
In
“Bicycling Renaissance in North America?”, the authors write about steps to
increase cycling in North America. All seven proposals seem fairly reasonable
and although these proposals were meant to be seen on the national level, I
surprisingly came across a city-wide initiative to increase bicycling in New
York City.

As
I’m reading about this ‘new and exciting’ program rolling out next summer, I’m
thinking about if CitiBike will really be as successful as other bike sharing
programs in other nations. Anne VanderMey from Fortune magazine clearly
illustrates my sentiment in an introductory paragraph to an article about bike
sharing in America:
In the Netherlands, there is such as thing as
the bicycle school bus, a 12-person rig that children can pedal while an
adult steers them to school. In Japan, cyclists deposit their bikes
into curbside machines that subsume them into robotically enabled underground parking
structures. In China, the government has made the development of electronic
bikes -- bicycles with built-in mechanical assist -- a national priority. In
America, however, it's not unheard of for people to drive to the end of their
driveway to get the mail.
Yes, New York isn’t as car dependent as other areas in the US, but as the largest bike sharing initiative the US has ever planned on, this one in NYC, might not even work. Critics have argued that bikers and motorists fight over precious road space daily, and increasing the amount of bicycles on the road as a ‘fashionable niche interest’ is absurd. Additionally, the health benefits, and reduced pollution don’t quite justify the amount of taxpayers money that goes into high capital, technological, and maintenance costs. Well, luckily, the CitiBike sharing initiative is all privately funded so critics can’t take a stab at the economic costs of introducing a city-wide biking initiative (because gosh- the US can’t spend a little extra to reduce obesity rates, or the amount of CO2 placed in the atmosphere). Well, way to be pessimistic.
![]() |
Bus Shelter, especially for those who like dry seats for rainy days |
If
these were all the criticisms the critics can come up with, I can’t see why
this share biking program can’t take off. I’m sure there are other details
involved but as a former resident of the city, I would much rather ride a bike 2 miles
to the post office than to take the train during rush hour. The mayor has
incorporated bike lanes throughout major parts on the city, installed bike
shelters, and the city has even handed out red light tickets to signify they
mean business when bikers have the same rights and play by the same rules as
motorists. There are Summers Street Festival days where streets are closed
to motorists and the streets become quasi- fairgrounds.
![]() |
Buffered Bike Lanes! Bicycle safety should remain a priority for NYC |
Will
this bike initiate change anything in the city? I like to think on the bright
side, and say yes. Will it change the
bike culture around the nation? It’s getting there. Numerous other cities have
bike sharing programs- DC being one very prominent program. In the next coming
year, 17 new bike sharing programs will hit the US including San Francisco,
Baltimore, and St. Petersburg. Apparently,
this is the year to look for bikes around your neighborhood. I would love to
hear thoughts and experiences of those who’ve done bike sharing programs around
the world, but even more so around the nation.
Those bike robot things are cool! I have used them before when I lived in Japan.
ReplyDeleteBut seriously, great post about bike initiatives in NYC. Some of these programs exist in flyover country too- Minneapolis was just rolling out a similar program (ww.niceridemn.org) when I lived there. There was some criticism that the bike stations only existed in yuppie areas, so I think future efforts for these sorts of programs need to target low income communities where biking could be a serious commuting alternative.
For me, I like them because one of the main reasons I don't bike is I always forget where I locked it up...
Loved seeing this. Like you with NYC, I keep going back to France... but it's what I know better. (My U.S. experience has been in smaller, conservative places.) So, sorry. But I love the Velib program. It was replicated in our city, too--VeloStan (for the Polish guy, Stanislas). What I like about Velib is that it's an awesome example of a public-private partnership. JC Decaux, an advertising company (that does the billboards, etc.) sponsors the bike repairs & maintenance in exchange for advertising space at their stands. There are loads of possibilities for that type of thing in the states--we just need to convince for-profit companies that there are loads of benefits for them in sustainability.
ReplyDeleteI'm also optimistic about these bike sharing programs. I used one while traveling in Stockholm, and loved it. The program there was marketed directly to tourists (and, I imagine, local residents), which was fantastic because I would much rather pedal around than take public transport. The city offered a sort of "tourist pass" that gave the bearer access to museums, attractions, and the bike sharing program. It was particularly effective there, because the city had extensive bike lanes and maps, so I never felt unsafe riding in a strange place (even though I didn't bring my helmet!).
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing Mary. If I remember correctly in the late 90s and early 2000s there was a community project in Bloomington called the Yellow Bicycle Project where 30 bikes, painted yellow, were released in town for public use. When you got to your destination, you just left the bike there. As you can imagine, many of the bikes were stolen or vandalized and the overall program was not very organized or defined.
ReplyDeleteI believe with programs like CitiBike and the technology like GPS devices,online/debit payments,smart phone apps, etc will only facilitate more initiatives like this and it is time that Bloomington join in. IU was in talks with Social Bicycles to begin a bike sharing program on campus in 2011 but I don't know the current status. http://www.idsnews.com/news/story.aspx?id=81293
Also was able to find some comments from a meeting at IU that had concerning transportation: http://www.indiana.edu/~sustain/docs/ayinterns_08-09/Bike%20and%20Pedestrian%20Infrastructure_Bourland.pdf
-- In April, IU parking operations’ Doug Porter fielded a question about developing a bike-share program. “We spent a lot of time talking about this last year,” as the price of a barrel of oil approached an all-time high, he said. “But we expected gas prices would return to normal before too long. Sure enough, they did.”
Porter continued, admitting his aversion to seeing more bicycles on the road. Inadequate infrastructure. Too much conflict. Law breaking. Let the drivers have the road. Ask during a meeting who wants to see more people bicycling, every hand goes up, he said. Ask who wants to do it themselves, all hands stay firmly on the table, eyes downcast, throats clearing, crickets chirping. ---
Interesting quote from Mr. Porter. Maybe the real key is then to improve the infrastructure. 'If you build it, they will come' Maybe we should start by installing those brilliant buffered bike lanes you showed. They make so much sense and allow people to feel safer on the bike and they would in-turn increase biking participation!
Wow--I'm thinking it takes some major courage to bike in New York City. All the traffic! But if they have separated bike lanes like the ones you showed, that would go a long way toward making me feel safer.
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned red light tickets--are those to cyclists? The Pucher et al. reading this week talked a lot about legal rights and public image. I think in a lot of ways these two go hand-in-hand--the public image of cyclists will improve when a) ALL cyclists obey vehicle laws and b) motorists are better educated about cyclists' rights. Observing cyclists being punished for illegal driving might foster some acceptance among motorists who perceive bikers as erratic and a menace on the road. (Because, let's face it--some are, running read lights, weaving lanes, etc.)
(As a side note, I am really interested in road laws specifically for bicycles. I don't think all motorized vehicle laws are safest/make the most sense for cyclists, and some people are talking about how to make cycling laws that are better for everyone on the road. Another thing on my list of interesting things to look into in all my free time! Any insights?)
I agree with Calley on this-- I'm not sure I would have the courage to bike through New York City, though that's mainly because I'm not very experienced with biking. My first time in years was this summer in Amsterdam. If you've never been there, let me just tell you-- there are bikes EVERYWHERE! I was more concerned about wrecking into another biker than being hit by a car. (Here is the bike parking lot at the train station http://dapull.99streets.netdna-cdn.com/i/aa/P1100983-1.jpg and it was always hard to find a place to lock your bike along the canals http://travelingcanucks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/bikes-amsterdam-netherlands-1.jpg)
ReplyDeleteLondon also has a very extensive bike rental program which can be accessed through a membership or simply by paying with a credit card. Unfortunately, they require chip and pin credit cards, so I was never able to use them while I was there.
The idea seems really great! It would be nice as you said to ride a bike vs. take a cab especially if you need to go only a few blocks away. If the city has buffered bike lanes around, I can see the program being successful. Maybe work better in a less crowded city? If people didn't have readily available cabs all around, I feel the program would work better. However, it's nice to see other cities interested in incorporating a cycling initiative.
ReplyDeleteMary -- thanks for writing about one of my favorite transportation initiatives. The cb bikes (in DC) are always in use and great for a city filled with expensive cab fares and a subways system that can't handle the exponential population growth in recent years. As you mentioned, the great thing about Citibike is that it is privately owned and operated--which is (unfortunately) a great way to stave off potential "investment" critiques. However, I wonder how feasible the system will be on the following parameters: 1) physical upkeep: NYC is the biggest system launched by far! Is Citi equipped to manage and fund all of the necessary moving pieces (pun intended)? I am curious as to when the venture will be profitable--after all operating costs are covered. 2) Patrons: will this program get people out of cabs or simply out of the subways/off the sidewalk? I am inclined to hypothesize that cyclists will be subway-goers rather than folks in a suit on their way to a meeting or a group on their way to a bar. Therefore, how much will it really do for congestion? 3) Safety: if it does in fact bring more folks above ground (who would otherwise be on the subway) will this actually increase congestion and accidents? This guy seems to think so: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-robert-morse/citi-bike-share-program-i_b_1755757.html. And what about helmets?!
ReplyDelete